As promised, here is my breakdown of the policy changes in SD76 that came as a direct result of Bill-24.
And in Part 2, I walk through in detail the complete judgement on the Bill-24 Injunction.
As a bonus, have a listen to John Carpay and what he thinks of the judgement. Suffice to say, they WILL be appealing.
“One of the most shallow judgements I’ve ever seen” – Carpay
In this episode of the “Eminent Sire’s Pontifications” I discuss the June 20th Court Injunction against Bill-24 heard at the Medicine Hat Court of Queens Bench
Some other info you might be interested in.
The Justice in the Bill-24 Injunction made reference to the TWU decision. The link below is an opinion piece from a non religious person on that decision.
The following video is about a man #Walkedaway from being a liberal. Interesting watch.
I’ve decided the best way to convey my concerns with the curriculum rewrite is through video, and for those that just want the highlights, I’ve included the outline I used to make the video. Not as much is conveyed, but you get the basic idea of where I am going with the video.
Curriculum meeting opened with a first nations land acknowledgment.
Host spoke of a process to nominate ‘experts’ who helped write the curriculum. No details on who or how were given.
The draft was divided into 5 sections. Math, arts, science, health, and social(ism).
Each section was essentially set up to show goals of concepts conveyed, what vague general items they were trying to convey for those goals, and what the students were supposed to take away from those conveyed concepts.
Arts and Social(ism) were clearly the focus, and Math and Science appeared to be the smallest. (I may be wrong on Math, but it was a small section of the wall, and I didn’t have time to go over it.)
The entire process seemed to indicate to me that they were not really interested in changing anything substantial, just that they wanted to gauge how well it would be received, and change some of the wording to be “more positive” and acceptable when they come out with the next draft.
The intent of the new curriculum seems to be focused on 3 main points:
The meetings were not set up for you to have any sort of reasonable amount of time to give proper feedback. I went to both sessions, and was only able to cover a “Cole’s Notes” overview of about half of it. Each 1.5 hour session had .5 hours of introduction (,including the first nations spiel,) and explanation of what it was they were allowing us to see.
Here is what I got from the individual groups:
Didn’t have time to cover it. Appeared to be small, and given what I know of the “new math,” did wish to waste what little time I had on it.
Clearly their main focus. Massive section. Outpaced all the other groups by several pages of objectives. What better section to incorporate culture and traditions than in the arts. Didn’t go over it.
I had the least issue with Science, and the answer I got to questions were direct and refreshing. No attempts to deflect or imply that I was reading into it things that were not there. The main issue I had was a section on energy, and interconnections between all living things, and a deliberate injection of first nations traditions in the ‘science’.
Health is where you really see their focus on becoming parents. I was surprised a potty training session wasn’t on the list. Issues of consent are in every grade. Implicitly in K and explicitly in 1-4. There is also crazy ideas of personal space, and parents needing to get permission from kids. (Even for hugging.) Lot of focus on identity, and mental health. (The kids knowing mental health, not the adults.) And there was something about Digital Citizenship responsibilities in grade 1. Not a fan of the sex ed/puberty talks in grade 4 either. Ya, that was in the old curriculum, (or so I’m told,) but just because it was before doesn’t mean it should be there now.
Global citizenship was a goal in every section, every grade. It was the one thing they wanted kids to believe. They also encouraged kids to be activists, and to set their value based on their identity group. Social Studies had zero history, and the only group that wasn’t included was white people. Social Studies was clearly written by the dangerous people peterson is talking about in the below video.
Other links referenced in the video:
On June 1st, I wrote a post drawing attention to a character assassination piece written by Collin Gallant of MHN. That unethical piece was a response to a still unpublished “letter to the editor” and sanctioned by the MHN’s own editors. At least one of the three editors, Bruce Penton, Kerri Sandford, or Scott Shmidt would have had to approve it. While publishing an article attacking a private citizen of Medicine Hat seemed pretty bad, and highly damaging to the credibility of the MHN, I never expected that they would attempt to dig ‘up’ out of the situation. I specifically stated that I was being hyperbolic when I said that MHN was putting on their inquisition credentials. It appears they missed that line, and took it as an outline of how they should proceed.
Today, June 12th, MHN published a “reply” “letter to the editor,” from a Karen D. LaHay. An employee of the Medicine Hat Public Libary (MHPL), who wanted to make sure you knew LaHay is a man who identifies as a woman. I will get into LaHay’s sanctimonious attack on a private citizen through a media platform that refuses to give the same courtesy to the man being attacked, in a moment. Right now I’m focusing on MHN’s complete lack of any integrity, ethics, or moral decency.
Through the obstinate refusal to publish Mr. Johnston’s letter, MHN displayed there complete lack of integrity, but it was the bias and discriminatory action of publishing a letter in response to the caricature of Mr. Johnston that Gallant shamelessly fabricated, that exposed their complete lack of ethics or ethical standards. Not, only that, but they published a letter that clearly besmirched, if not defamed, the identity of Mr. Johnston, and any of his “like minded followers.” That alone shows the moral depravity of the media organization. It also shows flagrant bigotry to opposing ideas and/or religious beliefs. MHN has clearly shown themselves to be intolerant hypocritical bullies, and like all bullies, they are also cowards. For only a coward would attack a man, let others attack that man, and refuse to allow that man to defend himself, and only a spiteful bully would encourage a mob to go after defenseless person for having the wrong opinion.
It is for those reasons that I feel I am compelled to call upon all the free thinking, religious, liberal, and falsely maligned people of Medicine Hat to boycott MHN news. I do not say this lightly, but it seems evidently clear that they can’t be trusted to be impartial in their reporting, and they appear to take a fair amount of glee in belittling the people of Medicine Hat, if they dare to disagree with the fascistic tactics of the LGBT™. Tolerant only of those who agree with them.
So, if you have a subscription, cancel it. If you advertise in the MHN, stop. Write letters to city council demanding that they no longer advertise with them either. Inform them of what MHN is doing. The only way the bullying will stop is if you stand up to them, and you do that, by refusing to give them your (lunch) money. I provided the e-mail addresses of the editors with their names at the top of the post. Write and demand an apology. Stand up, take courage, and defrock the inquisition.
Only a sincere, front page apology by every individual involved in the Gallant piece would sooth my outrage at the crass actions of the MHN. In the meantime, I doubt anyone boycotting them would actually miss them. Now, LaHay and the MHPL, that is a different situation altogether. How to handle that, is little different.
LaHay’s letter in response to the unseen letter by Mr. Johnston immediately jumps into mocking Mr. Johnston’s “two minutes of fame,” despite having had no moment of ‘fame’. LaHay then immediately gets the facts wrong, and says Mr. Johnston was given a platform to spread his alleged hatred. I see no platform that was given to Mr. Johnston, and I dare LaHay to actually state what exactly Mr. Johnston is alleged to have said that was so full of hate. It looks like LaHay has insider knowledge of this alleged letter, and if that is the case and the letter was given by anyone other than Mr. Johnston, that only makes LaHay out to be the unethical one. LaHay then claims that Mr. Johnston was engaging in a personal attack, but provides zero evidence of such. LaHay concludes by using revolutionary language stating the intolerant self-righteous arrogant crowd are here to stay. Then invites you all to come down to your tax funded public library to hear more condescending indignation about how special and worthy of praise they are and oppressive you are.
Now, I can’t speak for everyone else, but I for one don’t care to darken the doors of the MHPL ever again. Not to mention I don’t even need to know the details of the whole “social media policy” of the MHPL. It is plainly obvious that they have a set of values that they have chosen, and if you have other values, you are not welcome. Why anyone would want to be part of that toxic environment is beyond me. To employ a person who slanders a man in a public paper, and to double down by inviting the public to come and hear that employees life story as something empowering and to strive for is just shameful. If that is the kind of ethics they stand for, I would never wish for my children to learn anything from them. I want my kids to grow up valuing every person equally, not spitting vitriol and disdain at people who disagree with them. “Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.”
Earlier today, Steven Crowder did a second segment on there only being 2 genders in his “Change My Mind” discussions. I found this session particularly interesting as he had a conversation with both a transgender person, (Male to Female identity,) and an intersex person who says they were born with a Y chromosome and a vagina. (A very real type of intersex defect.) There were a number of things in the conversation that struck me.
I’ve consider doing my own “There are only 2 Genders” but do it “I’m intersex, and there are only 2 genders. Change My Mind.” Maybe Canada day… we will see. I took particular exception to the intersex person using their defect to ignore the facts in front of them, and presume to speak for all people with the ‘spectrum’ of intersex defects. There actually is a cluster, not a spectrum. A spectrum requires there to be no defined steps. Each intersex defect has a name, and each has different genetically identifiable characteristics. One might even call it biology and science.
Today, Medicine Hat News (MHN) published an article by Collin Gallant laced with typos, about local man Sheldon Johnston’s letter to the editor of MHN. As of the time of publishing this, two independent residents have not been able to locate a posted full text copy of Mr. Johnston’s letter, anywhere on the MHN website.
Gallant purports that Mr. Johnston was not pleased with a social media post by the Medicine Hat Public Library, (the Library) which, according to Gallant, Johnston said was favoring one view over another. Without the full text of Mr. Johnston’s letter, we are left to accept Gallant’s word alone on the matter.
From a printed piece, one can expect to have to look up referenced material one’s self, but with a web article, linking to relevant material is exceptionally easy, as I have already shown. Gallant mentions the Library’s social media piece which allegedly sparked Mr. Johnston’s letter, but does not give the text of it, and no photo reference is given anywhere in the piece. We are told of the Library’s program called “Human Library Catalogue,” but are not even given detailed info on that.
As a matter of full disclosure, Mr. Johnston and I have in the past worked along side each other in CPoSD76 matters, but more than a year ago myself, the CPoSD76, and Mr. Johnston parted ways because of irreconcilable difference in approach to certain matters. Yet, despite our disagreements, I can not abide hit pieces by media groups against private individuals in the community. Make no mistake, this was a hit piece.
1. Gallant and the MHN do not give you the full context of what Mr. Johnston wrote, nor the full context of the social media conversation that Mr. Johnston allegedly referenced. I am no lawyer, but it looks to me like Mr. Johnston has ample room to pursue libel against MHN. The only reason I know that, is because of research I was forced to do on libel when CHAT News did a hit piece against myself. A news agency with it’s own sordid history of poor reporting and attacking those they don’t agree with.
Without the full text of Mr. Johnston’s letter, we, the public, are unable to verify the veracity of Gallant’s claims as to the content of Mr. Johnston’s letter. We have no context to the statements Mr. Johnston allegedly made. Was Mr. Johnston being sarcastic in any of his statements? Did he give multiple examples of the bias he allegedly believed the Library was displaying? Did he give suggestions on how to thwart the alleged bias? Was he just ranting, as is common in letters to the editor? We will never know, because MHN didn’t deign to tell us. In so doing they have potentially defamed the character of a private resident of Medicine Hat, who holds no public office or position of authority.
2. Gallant opened the piece by describing Mr. Johnston as “A Medicine Hat man with a history of commenting on gay and transgender issues”. Shortly there after also stating that Mr. Johnston, “… has been a vocal opponent of gay-straight alliances in schools as proposed by the Alberta government.” Immediately and willfully painting Mr. Johnston in an anti LGBTQ light, before even getting into the alleged details of the as yet, unproven letter to the editor. Neither statement being necessary to the topic at hand. If we can not know what it is that Mr. Johnson is supposed to have written, what is the point of Gallant’s piece, other than to belittle a man for having an opinion? Are we to presume that there was sufficient evidence in Mr. Johnston’s claims to warrant a follow up by MHN, without even showing the public what led them to dig deeper and seek out the Library’s response? A response, I might add, to something no one has seen.
As I referenced in my post about the Solidify prong of the C.P.O.S. plan, MHN news has it’s own pro LGBT™ bias. No more clearly evidenced than the statement by it’s official social media account that “it’s a pretty straight line from strict social conservative to those who back conversion therapy groups.” It is common knowledge that the public understands “conversion therapy groups” as those who employ such tactics as beating, electro shock therapy, and self-abasement as legitimate tactics to ‘force’ the conversion of a homosexual individual. Gallant even mentions one commenter on the Library’s alleged social media post, that allegedly makes that connection to forced conversion therapy. It is clearly evident that MHN knows well the public connotations that go with “conversion therapy groups” and they are all to happy to promote that false narrative.
Laying aside the fact that this was a hit piece, one has to consider a few other facts. In order for this piece to have been written, the editor of MHN would have to have received Mr. Johnson’s alleged “letter to the editor,” the editor would then have to assign the piece to a writer, the writer would have to submit their piece for approval, and a copy editor would have to correct any mistakes. Given the number of malformed sentences and punctuation errors in the piece that I have archived, it would appear that this piece did not get properly screened. We can not lay the blame solely on Gallant, as a number of senior staff members would have had to be in the know on this piece before it was ever published.
If you take into consideration the social media statement on social conservatives by the official MHN account, the fact that a letter to the editor sparked Gallant’s piece, the multiple miss-characterizations of the Concerned Parents in the past, and the ridiculous understanding of the United Conservative Party’s founding AGM policy proposal that MHN encouraged, I can only conclude that the MHN has systemic anti conservative bias. In my opinion, they have lost all credibility to report impartially, and as such, if I can not take them at their word on social issues, I can not trust them on any topic.
As to the other point of Gallant’s article, whether or not the Library was showing bias against religious groups in favour of the LGBT™ dogma, I can not go into great detail. I am lacking sufficient facts to form an opinion. All I can say is, while concerned parents and business owners were being harassed and threatened during the petition period, for refusing to kiss the ring of any and every self-proclaimed pontiff of the LGBT™, MHN news and other local media were nowhere to be found. Some media were even participating in the disparaging attacks. But the minute a private citizen dares to resist the LGBT™ doctrine, MHN is there to slap on their inquisitor credentials and burn them at the stake. I’m being hyperbolic of course.
So, on the Library situation, ask yourself this. Would a publicly funded library be OK with a Christian employee proclaiming their Christianity at work, and would the Library suggest that patrons go and ask that employee what a Christian’s believes are and life is like, as they did for the trans employee? If you can’t see the answer to that being yes, than the Library is absolutely anti-religious and bias in it’s policies. And hey it’s been widely publicized that I’m intersex, so I can expect my invitation to participate in the “Human Library Catalogue” to arrive any day now. … Any day now.
This is the 4th and final post on the C.P.O.S. plan going forward.
The last prong of the plan is to:
Solidify the Family and parental authority into public education and culture through policy proposals for both provincial government and school boards, and the lobbying of political parties to establish and recognize those principles. To do this via all legal avenues available.
Never before in the history of our country has the family been so thoroughly and unabashedly under attack. We are surrounded by socialist thugs, cowardly conservatives who do not believe principles are worth standing on, and brutal death worshipers who think giving our kids over to predators, abusers, and pedophiles is in the best interest of ‘normal’ development. We must stand against it, and refuse to follow their narratives. Refuse to accept their irrational rationales.
The last prong of C.P.O.S. is about making a stand for the family, and refusing to compromise. Refusing to accept the lies. Refusing to back down because someone might call us a mean name. We must be the men and women that refused to stand by while evil succeeded.
Three weeks ago, I had the pleasure of attending the United Conservative Party founding AGM. There I was able to participate with other like minded Albertans, and see several policies passed that enshrined protections for the family into the party constitution and mission. (To be completely honest, I was there as part of this prong of the plan.)
You need look no further than the UCP AGM to see just how badly the family is under attack, and for an explanation as to why this prong of the plan is necessary. No sooner had the party been lectured by a minority cabal of members, clearly ignorant of the reasons and intent of the policy being voted, then a separate(?) cabal of castrated cowardly media virtue signalists were quoting the same ignorant members back to the leader and asking how it felt to be the leader of such a massive amount virulent bigots.
Every media outlet from CHAT to Global was wailing into the interwebs about how conservatives wanted to out gay kids, and let their parents beat them to death. So foolish and inaccurate was their musings, that we had a local bakery think they needed to send a tray of rainbow donuts to their MLA, telling him how it was OK to be gay. Medicine Hat News even openly told me that they think it is a straight line between being conservative and supporting “Gay Conversion Therapy.” (Just so you know, that is code for electrocuting gays, yes, MHN thinks if you are a strict conservative, you want to electrocute gays.)
So what was the policy that had journalists curled up in the corner of the tub showering with their clothes on? A policy asking that the UCP affirm the Family as the foundation of good society, and that parents be informed if their kids are being exposed to explicit sexual or religious content at school. Let that sink in. Stop and pause after the next sentence to really fully understand where we are at as a province and country. The media had immediately leaped from a policy about protecting the family unit, and informing parents if their kids were at risk from sexual and/or religious predators, to “they want to out gay kids, and put them at risk to being beaten by their parents.”
The leader of the UCP didn’t help the situation any either. While thousands of delegates were still debating and passing several other pro family and education policies with 75-90% support, the leader was throwing all their hard work under the bus. Saying that the 100s of hours, and thousands of viewers of the policy, had quote “poorly written” it. Like all the lawyers and professionals that helped write, had no idea what they were doing. Not to mention the leader gave zero mention of what part specifically was “poorly written,” or problematic.
The UCP leader went further down the rabbit hole talking about how Bill 10 had overwhelming support, (by the government that got ousted at the next opportune moment,) that parents don’t have to know if your kids join a chess club, and that he never supported mandatory informing of parents. Immediately falling into the clutches of the ridiculous media narrative that knowing if your kid are going to a GSA somehow outs their sexuality. That is a trash argument. What is the mechanism by which kids are outed? Tell me specifically. In order for that to be true, the GSAs would have to be a bigoted group, ONLY for gay people, with straight people not welcome.
Now, I’m going to go on a bit of a tangent here, and express a view that is wholly mine, and not supported by several other concerned parents. I do not agree with withholding ANY activities from parents, unless they can categorically prove telling the parents would be putting the child at risk. A parent has the RIGHT to know who their children are associating with, and what activities they are up to. What if your child joined a video game club at school, but you only allow them an hour of games a day? They are circumventing and undermining your rightful authority as a parent to raise them as you see fit.
What if the local chess club is a front for the local gang? Used to recruit children. Would it be OK for the admin to keep that a secret from you? GSAs are a front for exposing your children to explicit sexual content. That is a fact. The GSA Network has been repeatedly caught having explicit sexual content linked to their network. The admin across this province were completely oblivious to it. Some, like our SD76 Board Chair even convinced themselves that the network was hacked, rather than admit that it happened. Bill-24 made GSAs exempt from having to let you know if explicit sexual content was being shown in the club. Still trust the admin to make good judgment as to what you need to know about and what you don’t? I sure don’t.
So, back on point. With the UCP AGM being clear evidence, among a mountain of other examples I can’t go into here, that the current media, government, and LGBTQ™ have a hatred and fear of the family, (some might even call it familyphobia,) what specifically can we do to enact the Solidify prong of the C.P.O.S. plan? We must take this one opportunity at a time. There are two events in the next 2 weeks that you can participate in, that could help solidify the family to our government, schools, and courts.
The Concerned Parents of SD76 will be at both.
On June 6th the Alberta School Councils’ Association will be presenting the draft curriculum for K-12, specifically focused on K-4.
Details of the session are as follows:
DATE: Wednesday June 6, 2018
TIME: 1:00 pm – 2:30 pm (or 6:30 pm – 8:00pm)
PLACE: Grant Henderson Learning Centre,
Medicine Hat School Division Central Office
601 – 1st Ave SW,
During this session you will have the opportunity to:
learn about how the curriculum is changing
see the draft K-4 curriculum documents
provide feedback on ways the draft K-4 curriculum can be strengthened
This is an opportunity to have a say in the development of Alberta’s future provincial curriculum, and we are pleased you can participate!
You can register for the event here. I have registered the CPoSD76 for the 1 – 2:30 session. If you have not been able to register, but wish to attend, you can come out to the 1pm session, and I’ll attempt to get you in under the CPoSD76.
The JCCF Bill-24 court injunction is an all day hearing, that is open to the public. Bill-24 is a tyrannical law, that strips parents of their rights, and puts our children at risk of physical, psychological, and emotional harm. Stand with me and other parents at the court house on June 8th at 10AM
We the people of Medicine Hat stunned the justice when we had the petition challenge, with 100 people in the benches. Lets come out in massive respectful, peaceful solidarity for the solidification of our rights as parents, and for the protection of our children, and the family from tyrannical intrusion by the state.
That concludes the series on the CPOS plan. As additional events and activities come up, I will be posting them, and indicating which prong of the plan applies to them. In the meantime, I will close with a somber warning from Wilders, on what happens when you refuse to stand up for your rights, and for your family. Before you know it, you may be arrested for trying to protect someone from a Muslim rape gang, that is being protected by the police, because you are not allowed to criticize any action of the government. That is the consequence for not solidifying the family in government. Government becomes your ‘family,’ with the right to raise you as they see fit.
(Photo by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation)
On Tuesday February 6th I shared on my public Facebook page, an article about a Father Daughter dance at a school in Statin Island that was canceled because of gender neutral policies. I made a reference to how it was more evidence that the LGBT™ hate the family. Which they do, and the hate crimes against the family continue to mount, but I’m getting off track here….
I’m sure you all have either seen or heard our Prime Minister’s ridiculous assertion that “mankind” be replaced with “peoplekind,” and then his double down absurdity that he was joking. Just ignore his past behaviour of declaring himself a Feminist, that his sons suffer from toxic masculinity, that he pushed through C-16, a law about forcing a change in language, or his demand that all Canadians swear allegiance to his party’s believe that baby murder is OK. Ignore all that. Ignore that he has since told government employees that they are not alowed to call people Mr., Mrs., or Miss., and that Father and Mother are outlawed terms. Trudeau was tooaootally joking.
We are seeing a trend. A very unsettling trend. A trend descending into madness and tyranny, and to be frank, I’m getting tired of pulling peoples heads out of the ground. Look, I get it, you are tired. You are busy. You are trying to eek out a living, and you are doing the best you can to provide for your family and educate your kids. I had a resident recently say, “We need to get these people voted out.” We just had an election, and the majority kept the status quo. The cold hard reality is, most of you aren’t helping the situation. The last school municipal election saw 6000 votes. Out of 60,000? Nearly three times that voted for city council. Are you telling me you could get out to vote for a mayor, but not a school board? I’m hearing the Catholic Board vote numbers were just as abysmal. Lets take the two combined. Do you expect me to believe that only 20% of the population of Medicine Hat has kids? (Ignoring that you don’t have to have kids to vote for a school board.) The government isn’t going to leave you alone, they are already going after your kids.
I can’t put it any other way. If you didn’t vote, you have contributed to the problem. But lets not cry over spilled milk. The past is the past, and although we need to learn from it, (which AB Ed doesn’t seem to be able or want to do,) we do not need to dwell on it. So, how can you help, and how can you fix this?
Well first, admit and recognize the problem. What exactly is the problem you ask? Well you could read through the old post on here to learn in more detail, but it can be summed up in one word. Pernicious. You see, over the last couple of years, I have struggled to find language that can get my point across, make people uncomfortable enough to pay attention, and drive people to action. The ‘left’ has done such a fine job in redefining everything from lying, to rape, that it is near impossible to have an intelligent conversation anymore. Truth isn’t even THE truth anymore, it is YOUR truth.
So in my effort to stay informed and educated on world events that will affect my family, I came across a video clip from Fox News Insider. In which Jordan Peterson is being interviewed about the range of topics I’ve mentioned above (Trudeau, Peoplekind, Father Daughter Dances, Ze, Zer, and Zem). At one point while talking about policy to enforce language, he states
“It is not compassion and care that is driving this. It is the desire to put forward a very pernicious ideology.” – Jordan Peterson
It struck me. There is the perfect word to describe the problem in our school district, and Alberta Education as a whole. Best of all, untainted by the language jackboots. But I better give you the definition before I continue, or they may have a chance to defile it.
“Definition of pernicious
1 : highly injurious or destructive : deadly
2 archaic : wicked” – Merriam-Webster
No word better describes the situation in Alberta Education.
David Eggen’s Bill-24 was/is Pernicious.
Kris Well’s handling of the GSA Network was Pernicious.
Eggen’s attack on Wisdom Home School was Pernicious.
Rachel Notley’s statements about Catholic education were Pernicious.
Alberta Health telling parents their 3 year old might be trans-gender is Pernicious.
The ASBA, PSBA, and ATA attack on school choice was Pernicious.
The deception of and lies told to parents by the Calgary, Lethbridge, and Medicine Hat School Board’s was Pernicious.
The Guidelines to Best Practices (GTBP) are Pernicious.
The handling of SCHS Washroom issues is Pernicious.
The handling of bullying at Alexandra School is Pernicious. (They know what I am talking about.)
The unjust persecution of students who have refused the enlightenment of the LGTB™ at Medicine Hat High is Pernicious. (Again, they know what I am talking about.)
Honestly, I don’t care if what I just said offends you. You should actually be offended by the obscene actions I’ve just listed. You should be irate. Blistering with intolerance. One does not tolerate if your child is shooting up with heroine in your home. That is what is happening with Alberta Education. The education minister, Guidelines to Best Practices, and the various local school boards are forcing your kids to adopt, celebrate and participate in a pernicious life of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse that will destroy their lives. It will remove any chance of them being content with their bodies, having healthy long term relationships with partners, and in 2/3rds of the education, remove any hope of having children….unless of course they take the children from the parents that wouldn’t push this pernicious life.
The parent council of Ross Glen Elementary told me a few months ago that the Alberta Health Services resource on sex and sexuality was a great source of help for parents, and that is why they were endorsing and promoting it at the school. As I told them, a resource that talks about preventing STD/Is, but then says a 3 year old can be trans-gender, is a terrible resource. (It is also child abuse.) It shows that AHS doesn’t even understand basic human biology, medicine, or pediatric development. AHS, is there by the least competent organization to be educating on sexual health.
Hitler took Germany out of the worst economic disaster in it’s history and turned into a super power. But we don’t have children read “Mein Kampf” in school, or recommend it as reading material for political office. The Guidelines to Best Practices may say ‘bullying’ is bad, and tell you to treat everyone equally, but when they say this is done by making the sexually ‘diverse’ more equal than everyone else, and saying that uncles who identify as aunts should be allowed in the change room with nieces, you need to reevaluate it’s value as a whole. I mean, it’s first version recommended that students call each other comrade. Comrade. That isn’t a great resource, it is trash with a bow on top. At that point you start over, with less self-serving individuals developing it. Evil should never be tolerated, no matter how much you dress it up. If you can’t cut the uncomfortable stuff out of the Bible, or the koran, you can’t cut the uncomfortable stuff out of the GTPB. You adopt it as a whole, or not at all.
The coming years are not going to be easy. We are stuck with essentially the same school board for the next three and a half years, and we have to put up with the tyranny of the NDP for the next one and a half at least. We know they are not above insulting, lying, harassing, and general childish tantrums, so how do you stop this pernicious direction of the government?
The Concerned Parents of SD76 have come up with a 4 pronged plan to help combat this pernicious governance, but it is going to take parents of conviction who are committed and willing to put the best interests of their children above all the threats, harassment, and general childish tantrums of the LGBT™, Alberta Education, the NDP and their (philosophical) hit squads in social/media.
The plan is being called CPOS. Create, protect, orate, and solidify. Ya, terrible acronym, but have you seen the current LGBT™ one? It has a 2 in it. So you will have to excuse me for not caring about how well it rolls off the tongue.
Over the next Month, I will be making 4 seperate posts about what exactly each prong of the ‘4orked’ plan is, and how the coalition hopes to implement it. For now though, there are two prongs you can get started on yourself.
Protect: April 23rd, 2018 is international walk out day to protest the obscene, abusive, bigoted, and abhorrent sex education that is being forced in schools around the world. (Bill-24 provides no limits to the material that your child can be exposed to at school.) I encourage every parent, who’s children are not home schooled, to pull their child out of school on April 23rd. Explain that you do not support the sexualization of our children for the satisfaction of adults with unhealthy obsessions over the sexual development of other people’s pre-pubescent children, that Bill-24 is an unconstitutional violation of human rights, and that parents have first discretion and authority over their children and their education, not the government. Do this whether your school has supported the family or not, as a show of solidarity to those who have not had the ability or choice to send their children to a school that supports their rights.
Orate: Take the time April 23rd to educate yourself and others on the dangers of Bill-24, what is being taught in your district on gender identity and sexuality. Familiarize yourself with the details of your districts ‘safe and caring’ policy, and learn if it really is ‘inclusive, equal, safe and caring’. Share what you learned on social media and at family outings. The time to keep silent has passed. Leaving them alone will not make them leave you alone. Living in a bubble will not help your children.
Let people know that Bill 24 is being challenged by over a dozen individuals and groups, and that the government is trying to cross a line that they “shall not pass.”
Our governance and education is swiftly moving toward a tyrannical system of oppression and malevolent malfeasance, and we need to stand up to it, or face a generation or more of misery.
I thought I would
highlight some things that have happened in the past few weeks around the world. Maybe you should as well.
So last week, the Communist Party of China (CPC) . . . the only party in China, moved to make President Xi, president for life. Then, in a not unheard of move, the CPC banned Animal Farm and oddly the letter ‘N’ from the Inter
net. This ridiculous ness led to a reporter, disgusted with a staged news event in Chi na being stripped of her news crede ntials. This is n‘t all that surprising after all, this is Chi na, a Commu nist dystopia.
Ya, that is
n‘t a good example. Let’s move a little further west. How about the UK? Ya, tea a nd crumpets a nd all that. God save the Queen etc. After all, Ca nada was fou nded o n British pri nciples. Well, just a few days ago Laure n Souther n was o n her way to Engla nd, after wrapping up a docume ntary o n the oppressive racism agai nst the Boer i n South Africa, that by all accou nts is likely to become a ge nocide or civil war. She was e nteri ng from the Calais Fra nce border. She was detai ned u nder the Schedule 7 a nti-terrorism act of the UK. The Brits wa nted to ba n her from their British utopia, but did n‘t have a nything to charge her with. So they held her a nd i nterrogated her u ntil they fou nd out she called Allah gay as part of a social experime nt. It’s OK to call God a gay trans woma n i n the UK, but not Allah. They the n u nceremo niously ba n ned her from the UK a_d they dropped her alo ne outside the wall at 6am, i n a city notorious for rapi ng you ng white female jour nalists a nd aid workers. Her crime? Racism of course, a nd being a threat to the stability of the UK!
Ya, I k
now what you are thi nking. The UK has the right to ba n whoever they wa nt. Eve n if it is based on xe nophobic a nti religious se ntime nt. Its not like their was a massive cover-up of Islamic rape ga ngs i n the UK. Not like 1000s of girls in Rotherham and Telford were abused for decades by Muslim sex rings. It isn’t like the police were more afraid of being called racist than protecting the children. Not like they called 11 year olds prostitutes and threated the families of the victims. No not like any of that happened.
Lauren Southern may be Ca nadia n, but that does n‘t protect her from the UK’s rules, so let’s move eve n further west, a nd a bit south. After all, the U.S. is the la nd of the free, a nd the home of the brave! Just yesterday hu ndreds of childre n marched out of class, to protest gu ns with a list of dema nds that were clearly not writte n by them. This would n‘t be all that bad i n a nd of it self, but there are reports now of stude nts bei ng threate ned by pri ncipals with arrest, a nd i nsta nces of assault agai nst stude nts for disagreei ng with the protests. Be n Shapiro stated i n yesterday’s (March 14th) podcast that he was getti ng 100s of letters by stude nts that are bei ng bullied a nd threate ned for not participati ng i n the protests. E-mails comi ng i n live as he was speaki ng. The Day fi nished with a teacher being suspe nded for suggesting that walkouts could be orga nized for a nything. Eve n pro-life eve nts.
You may be ratio
nalizi ng it by sayi ng those kids were i nse nsitive by bei ng pro gun at a ‘rally’ for victims of gun violence. Hate speech does n‘t protect you from the co nseque nces of your actio ns. I’m not going to concede that point, but let’s move on. So speaking about gun’s isn’t OK, but what about Tra ns-ge nder. Surely someo ne’s ide ntity is protected, a nd they can freely express it. That would n‘t get them censored or oppressed, would it?
Last week Steve
n Crowder was told he was n‘t welcome at South by South West (SXSW is a nerdy eve nt similar to the Calgary Comic & E ntertai nme nt Expo, which i ncide ntally I was ba n ned from havi ng a table at because of my affiliation with Christians, but that is a nother story,) because of a stu nt he pulled last year where crashed a pa nel by “The You ng Turks,” by imperso nati ng Ce nk Uygur. This “OF COUUURSE” was fu n ny, but it got him a nd Not gay Jared ba n ned for life. So this year, Crowder had o ne of his employees, Sve n Computer, go to SXSW a nd crash a Tra ns meet up, as Sve n Computer ide ntifies as a computer, a nd he has ide ntified as such for well over a year. Sve n computer mistake nly thought self-ide ntity was sacrosa nct.
n Computer was n‘t violent, a nd did nothi ng criminal he was throw n out of the eve nt, a nd the mi nute Crowder tried to upload the video to twitter, him a nd everyo ne i nvolved was immediately ba n ned from Twitter. The video was ba n ned from Youtube a nd Facebook, a nd people circulated a petitio n ‘dema ndi ng’ that Crowder take dow n the video from his ow n platform … for some reaso n.
So what they came to k
now is what I came to k now last year. Self ide ntity is o nly acceptable if you also alig n with the politics of those that wa nt self ide ntity to be accepted, a nd it has to be the the right ki nd of self ide ntity. Identifying as a Sire appare ntly isn’t ‘the right kind’. As Jordan Peterson would say, they, like Hamas, surrou nd themselves with ‘victims’ (of their ow n defi ned sta ndard,) so that if you ‘attack’ their believes, you have collateral damage to prop up a nd beat the ‘aggressors’ with.
Ok, but that is social media, a
nd ‘private’ eve nts. They ca n set their own rules. Ba n or kick whoever they wa nt for whatever they wa nt. Just ig nore the wedding cakes for gay people exception. Surely Ca nada is n‘t i nvolved i n a ny of this tyranny. We are the tha nk you people. The frie ndly lumber jacks with maple ca ndies. You could n‘t possibly thi nk that is happe ni ng here!
I’ll bet you are getti
ng pretty a n noyed with how hard it is getti ng to read this. Well, I hope you are a patie nt human, as we just e ntered Ca nada, a nd what you ca n a nd ca n‘t say u nder the new Liberal/ NDP tyra n ny is o nly goi ng to make this worse. Ca nada is the place where you ca n have your kids take n from you for not e ncouragi ng them to cut their pe nis off. The cou ntry where you must swear before the Dear Leader a nd his Cabi net that you are not pro-life, a nd would not try to fix your tra ns-child. The cou ntry that has premiers that will throw you i n priso n o n charges literally made up by the police because you are pro-life, a nd it does n‘t matter if you are 17 or 70. A n i njustice that they wa nt to bring to other provi nces.
n I was a child, I was proud of my cou ntry. I was proud of the freedom we had. I was proud of the sacrifice my gra nd pare nts made to protect our freedom. The n we started slaughtering children, with no restrictio ns. A claim o nly 3 cou ntries i n the world ca n pi n o n their chest. The n came gay u nio ns. Well, love is love, except whe n it is n‘t. The n ‘sex ed’ a nd tolera nce. The n euthanasia, legalized drugs, you nger euthanasia, forci ng doctors to recomme nd abortio n, forci ng pare nts to teach kids thi ngs contrary to their believes, hate speech, ‘islamophobia’, a nd eve n acceptable a ntisemitism Now if I were to pull out a book I read i n school o n the horrors of East Germany, the USSR, or Mao’s China, I would almost thi nk they were describi ng Ca nada without the mass starvation. Ca nada’s political positio n a nd policies are hardly disti nguishable from pre-war Nazi Germany. Those same books I read as a child would probably be ba n ned now, or at the very least ‘problematic’. I nstead they are replaced with wholesome stories of cross-dressi ng 5 year olds. Freedom is dying in Canada, a nd it is because not e nough good men are sta ndi ng up to the evil that is succeeding i n this cou ntry. History will spit o n our memory as they look back at how so many wasted their time on bread and circuses, while the evil one took our childre n and put them through the meat grinder of tolerance. While screami ng at the top of their lu ngs that words are hurtful a nd viole nt, that they have meaning, and should n‘t be said rashly, they are hypocritically telling us that policies like 622 a nd laws like Bill-24 are just words. You can trust them to use ‘common sense’ when applyi ng them, as they toss another 5 year old i nto a GSA to be told that their body is a mistake, and they need to change it. All in secret, so that pare nts do n‘t know the abuse the ir child is being subjected to by ‘professio nal’ identifiers of being born in the wrong body. The ideology of the left is demo nstrably evil. Repeated countless times throughout huma n history. Begetti ng o nly misery, despair, and death. Yet, just as we had to fight and die to stop nazi/fasc/social/communismm’s ‘utopia’ in the 30s, so to I’m afraid we will have to be fighting and dying to stop nazi/fasc/social/communism in the 30s. Unless of course we get a few 1000 more good courageous men to take their ‘methods’ and stick them back in the hellhole they came from.
The truth is, concepts affirming gender confusion are far more dangerous and abusive than providing counseling to a child to act and behave as what they are. Unless a child has an intersex defect, (and even then you better have a pretty strong argument to present,) there is no justification for trying to convince the child they are the opposite gender. Saying transgender children are 40-80% (that is just how widely the stat varies) more likely to contemplate suicide, and then pushing them to become transgender and ‘affirm’ it as a means of mitigating risk is utterly idiotic.
People who don’t wear seat belts are substantially more likely to die in a serious car accident than than those that do. When someone says they don’t like to wear a seat belt, because they are uncomfortable, we don’t affirm that belief and tell them not to wear one. We don’t force everyone else to take the belt of their children if they even so much as hint at it being uncomfortable. That would be neglect. That would be abuse, and it most certainly isn’t the solution to reducing serious car accident deaths.
So, when parents see a program like SOGI, and the clear signs of child abuse, (some might say child sexual abuse, but that depends on how you define sexual abuse,) and that it is being not only endorsed via policies like 622 by their schools, but enforced under law and threat of penalty, they are rightly and justly outraged.
Parents saw the clearly abusive, secretive, and subversive program being injected into schools, and saw the deliberate lies by self proclaimed ‘experts’ telling them that what was plainly in front of them is the exact opposite of what they see. “This is about protecting the kids, and your a bigot,” was the only answer they got. One can see why parents have so vehemently fought the ‘education’ system, and will continue to fight. Children are not guinea pigs for social experiments. One would do will to prepare for things to heat up again soon. Not even -38c will stand in their way.
An interesting note on forced political correctness, and it’s link to radicalization on all sides.
Here is a fact that’s gonna sound ragingly controversial but is not, and that is that capitalist societies are better than communist ones. If you doubt it, then just ask yourself the question, would I rather live in South Korea or North Korea. Would I rather live in West Germany in the 1970s or East Germany or in the 1960s? I submit that this is actually not a controversial statement, but in university campuses, it would be considered flamingly radical.
Here’s another one. Men and women are not identical in their life priorities, in their sexuality, in their tastes and interests. This is not controversial to anyone who has even glanced at the data. The kind of vocational interest tests of the kind that your high school guidance counselor gave you were given to millions of people, and men and women give different answers as to what they wanna do for a living and how much time they wanna allocate to family versus career and so on. But you can’t say it. A very famous person on this campus did say it, and we all know what happened to him. He’s no longer, well, he is on this campus, but no longer in the same office.
Here’s a third fact that is just not controversial, although it sounds controversial, and that is that different ethnic groups commit violent crimes at different rates. You can go to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Look it up on their website. The homicide rate among African Americans is about seven or eight times higher than it is among European Americans. And terrorism, go to the Global Terrorist Database, and you find that worldwide the overwhelming majority of suicide terrorist acts are committed by Islamist extremist groups.
If you’ve never heard these facts before and you stumble across them or someone mentions them, it is possible to come to some extreme conclusions, such as that women are inferior, that African Americans are naturally violent, that we all ought to be Anarcho-capitalists and do away with all regulation and social safety nets, that most terrorism in this country is the fault of Muslims. These are unwarranted conclusions because for each one of these facts there are very powerful counterarguments for why they don’t license racism and sexism and Anarcho-capitalism and so on…
Now let’s say that you have never even heard anyone mention these facts. The first time you hear them, you’re apt to say, number one, the truth has been withheld from me by universities, by mainstream media, and, moreover, you will be vindicated when people who voice these truths are suppressed, shouted down, assaulted, all the more reason to believe that the Left, that the mainstream media, that universities can’t handle the truth. So, you get vindicated over and over again, but, worst of all, you’re never exposed to the ways of putting these facts into context so that they don’t lead to racism and sexism and extreme forms of Anarcho-Libertarianism. So, the politically correct Left is doing itself an enormous disservice when it renders certain topics undiscussable, especially when the facts are clearly behind them because they leave people defenseless the first time they hear them against the most extreme and indefensible conclusions possible. If they were exposed, then the rationale for putting them into proper political and moral context could also be articulated, and I don’t think you would have quite the extreme backlash.”
– Steven Pinker