Tag Archive Family Values

PRIDE goes before destruction: The fall of principles.

(Picture is of the Calgary Sexual Health [CSH] Center float in the PRIDE parade. CSH is the same organization that is fighting to impose Bill-24 against parents, regardless of the risks and harm to children that they themselves facilitate and enable.)

Recently, I came across a facebook post about a United Conservative Party (UCP) ‘PRIDE’ Event that was being hosted because the UCP were forbidden by the LGBT™ from participating in the LGBT™ proper events. I’ve not seen many people on the right talk about this, and I think we should be. I’ve postponed working on the next episode of ESP to discuss this, as one, it is relevant, and two, it is critical at this junction in Alberta politics.

The UCP’s decision to hold their own pride event, because they were forbidden from participating with the LGBT™ is divisive, foolish, & cowardly. And here is why:

Now, I know I’m going to get a lot of hate for writing this. Not just from the LGBT™, but from political circles, and probably even religious circles, but I want to point out first, I know every PRIDE event is different. Some are less scandalous than others. What I am talking about is the over-arching them of PRIDE. The purpose and intent in general. I’m talking about the events by the corporation of LGBT PRIDE. That is why I use the ™ character when I refer to the LGBT™. After all PRIDE is just the propaganda arm of the LGBT™.

1. PRIDE is about lewd debauchery:

Lets get right into it. PRIDE is about exposing sex and sexuality to the public. It is public indecency. Look at the photo I chose for this post, (I know, not very pleasant,)  that is the primary intent of PRIDE events. To get out in front and shove explicit sexual behaviour and content onto the public and demand that the public allow and support it.

Stop with the downcast gaze of shame, and LOOK. That photo is a relatively mild float for the PRIDE parade. And that is the Calgary Sexual Health Center, which is supposed to be a ‘children’s’ service in Calgary. They have people dressed likes penises and vagina. How is that not lewd and debasing? How is it helpful to children to see people dancing around in genitalia costumes?

The worst part is, that float is one of the better pictures I found from the Calgary PRIDE parade, and the Calgary PRIDE parade is generally considered a ‘tamer’ parade than say Toronto or Vancouver. I found one photo of Calgary ‘bears’ wearing BDSM gear. This is a parade with little kids watching. There are parades in Canada and the U.S. where men go around nearly nude, nude, or with assless-chaps, and engage in acting out anal sex, on the floats. These parades are so bad that the CBC had to write a PSA, to try and justify the child abuse that happens.

Why would UCP members want to associate their new party with that kind of debauchery? What benefit to the people does it serve, other than saying the UCP core believe is hedonism (even the CPC PSA admits that the point is screaming LGBT™ ‘values’)? If the UCP thinks they are not demeaning themselves by having their own event, then frankly, they’re stupid. You are no more going to be able to reclaim PRIDE, than ‘slut walks’ have reclaimed ‘slut’.

2. PRIDE supports child abuse, and the grooming and corruption of children:

I touched on this briefly in point one, but besides abusing the children that attend parades with gratuitous displays of indecency, PRIDE supports child trangenderism, which is nothing short of child sexual abuse and pedophilia.

John Money the ‘father’ of transgenderism sexually abused the children he experimented on, and made them pose and imitate sexual positions and acts. The twins he committed these abuse acts on, both committed suicide.

Alfred Kinsey, another ‘father’ of sexual studies forced his workers to molest infants, and had many of his young case studies masturbate for him. He also had correspondence with an actual Nazi, where they discussed how to cover their work, and keep people from knowing about what they really did. Kinsey’s primary thesis was that we are born sexual beings, and should not try to stop it, even among infants and toddlers. Ie. Kinsey was a pedophile.

PRIDE has also directly awarded people like Kristopher Wells, whom you can hear me talk about repeatedly on this site. A man I personally think should be on the sex offender list for his exposing kids to pornography, and his homosexual ‘camps’ where parents are forbidden. As I mentioned in an earlier episode of ESP, PRIDE gave an award to Rob Wells, a man convicted of stunt driving, and was just recently witnessed trying to intimidate a 7 year old.

PRIDE in Ontario symbolizes the ripping apart of families, ironically, under the guise of the child abuse of refusing to abuse your child. It symbolizes ‘the sex abuse ed’ of child rapist Benjamin Levin. In Oregon, it symbolizes the effective kidnapping for ransom of 15 year old girls, with the support of teachers, the school boards, and the courts.

Why would the UCP want to associate with a movement who’s primary history is child abuse? I thought government was supposed protect it’s people from abuse, assault, rape, and molestation, not endorse and promote it. The UCP should wash their hands of anything PRIDE, and just say “No thank you, we don’t even want your vote if you support child abuse.”


3. PRIDE is racist and bigoted:

Currently, there two definitions of “Racism” out there:

First, the one that everyone knows, and grew up with,  has an established cultural and social understanding of, and was not forced by fiat to be the meaning; that is that racism is the (oft-times irrational) believe by an identity group that they are superior to all other identity groups because of an immutable feature of that identity group. Such as skin color or place of birth.

PRIDE fits this definition because the LGBT™ believe that their sexual preference, transexual identity, and understanding of ‘gender’ is immutable. They believe that you are born homosexual or trans, (despite no genetic markers or evidence to support this,) and that there is no other understanding of gender that is acceptable. Even going so far as to say that their understanding of gender “transcends human understanding.” (See the peer-reviewed published paper by the trans-hippo.)

They believe these beliefs make them better, more virtuous, neigh superior to those who do not believe them, and the PRIDE events are their displays of this belief system, which they wish to force upon everyone else. (More on that in point 4.) You need only replace the phrase “LGBT PRIDE” with “White Pride” to see this.

The Second definition; which has no cultural acceptance, understanding, or common use, which has been forced via fiat by powers such as the New York Times, and is only really accepted within identity groups that feel they have ‘superior’ understanding of all things, such as academia, or elitists, is thus: Racism is prejudice + power.

PRIDE also fits this definition in every sense. The LGBT™ are demonstrably prejudice against anyone who disagrees with them. As seen by the harassment of any individual or agency who opposes them. In the first Masterpiece Cake Shop suit that went all the way to the supreme court of the United States, even said as much. That the Human Rights commission showed gross prejudice in their ruling against Masterpiece.

It is also clear that the LGBT™ and their PRIDE events have all the power. Again, look at the human rights commissions, the C-16 laws, the Universities that threaten students that say anything, Bill-10, and Bill-24. They have all the government’s full support. Then they also have legal institutions like the SPLC and ACLU. Millions in eager dollars to crucify anyone that dares to say anything. The recent supreme court ruling on Trinity Western, (along with the leader of the Ontario NDP,) even said that the LGBT™ rights are superior to all others. If that isn’t proof of power, then nothing is.

They are the racist bigoted oppressors, by their own definition! There is no need for PRIDE, there isn’t a single law in the west that oppresses or victimizes any of the LGBT™

Isn’t the UCP trying to distance themselves from racists and bigots? Are they not trying to ‘re-brand’ themselves as ‘big tent’, inclusive, and tolerant. Why are they trying to pander to a racist bigoted segment of society by associating with PRIDE events?

4. PRIDE is anti-democratic and tyrannical:

PRIDE is an oppressive tyranny, that will not tolerate any other system. If you have not noticed this, you have been living on Jupiter. Bill-10 and Bill-24 are supreme examples of this. No honest consultation or debate was even had on either of them. Despite Jason Kenney’s claim that Bill-10 was the will of the people with less than 4 hours of discussion on the matter, it was just a bunch of out of touch elitist MLAs who wanted to feel good about themselves. (MLAs that I remind you were booted at the next available opportunity.) They were both self-righteous Bills designed specifically to take away your rights and subjugate you and your children into obedience.

The LGBT™ are an incredible minority, that is not being oppressed, that have forced their control over the majority. Democracy is about majority rule, with checks and balances to prevent the tyranny of the majority and the minority. PRIDE celebrates denigrating the majority values of Canadians, and then goes so far to punish that majority for not complying. They don’t even care if the majority out votes them. | They just do what they want anyway. | Law and morality be damned.

The UCP first annual general meeting (AGM) had this on full display. The majority of the UCP clearly supported family values, but a minority of influential people attempted to brow beat the values of the assembly into accepting that which they did not. Thankfully they didn’t, but on that one vote, you can clearly see the affects of minority tyranny on the vote. This was further exemplified by the mob of media tyrants demanding that the leader of the party recant and condemn the views of the majority. Clearly, the LGBT™ and their media pets did not like democracy in action.

Why does the UCP want to repeat this, and associate with anti-democratic voices?

5. PRIDE will never welcome the UCP anyway:

You can’t build a bridge between fire and water. There is no bridge between PRIDE and the UCP. Just look at what PRIDE supporters have written about the UCPs attempt to have their own PRIDE event. They know there is no bridge. They know there is no compatibility.

The UCP crawling on their knees and kissing the feet of PRIDE multiple times in an attempt to be invited is frankly, pathetic. It makes the UCP look weak and impotent. It looks like Fildebrandt going and starting the Freedom Conservative Party. Immature and obstinate.

The irony is not lost on me, but show some real pride UCP. Kick off the filth from your clothes, stand tall, and just say, “We are fine without you. PRIDE stands for things that are antithetical to the principles of the majority of our party, and we are not ashamed of that. Good day.     I said GOOD DAY!”

6. PRIDE is not supported by the majority of Albertans, or the UCP

This is a simple fact. Stockholm or battered wife syndrome is not support. It is simply a state of apathy, an attempt to prevent as many beatings and abuse as possible. That is where most Albertans are. They are in a constant state of fear. They just want the beatings to stop, and they will literally vote or say whatever they need to, to survive. Fortunately with the UCP the voting members have stood their ground and said in a 70-90% majority, that enough is enough, and the LGBT™ oppressors have had their day. When the election finally roles around, I have faith that the majority of Albertans will reclaim their courage, and stand up to the abusers.

Right now, it is up to that UCP majority of members to put their foot down, and tell the leadership and those weaker members that the UCP is healthier and freer without PRIDE. The majority needs to protect the weaker minority who are faltering and trying to go back to their abusive partners. For their own good, the majority needs to stop the minority.

So what do we do?

Well, lets stop pretending that PRIDE has any value. It is valueless. What value is it teaching ‘society’ or our children? To engage in violent sexual activity with your peers? That sex is the greatest achievement of mankind? That the purpose of life is sex? That your worth is in the type of sex you have?

For my religious readers, pride is one of the most commonly condemned sins in the Bible. There is a reason it made the ‘seven deadly sins.’ So stop acting like PRIDE is a virtuous thing. God despises pride, and frequently brings those who revel in it low. Reminding them of just how insignificant their ‘pride’ is, in the grand scheme of things.

With the recent exposure of a long running scandal in the Catholic church that saw over 300 priests molesting and raping over 1000 children, and it being deliberately covered up to protect the church and homosexual pride from taking a hit, we see the need to weed out PRIDE from the UCP, before it takes root. Sure we may lose a few votes from ignorant allies, but in the long run, the UCP will be a less corrupt, principled, and stable party.

This is how I think you should handle this:

1. Sign the petition I made over at change.org saying that you will boycott the UCP PRIDE event, for the reasons I’ve specified here. ‘Change’ petitions are useless, as far having power in and of  themselves, but if thousands of Albertans sign a petition saying they will engage in a boycott, that has power. A name among thousands on a petition isn’t going to get you a beating from the LGBT™, so you are safe on that account.

2. Contact your UCP candidate/MLA and let them know you would rather throw your vote at the FCP than for the support of the promotion of depraved obscenity. Think you don’t have the courage for that? Just think about what you would say if the UCP was hosting it’s own Slut Walk on a Sunday. PRIDE is the same thing. Again, you are safe from LGBT™ abuse/backlash unless your MLA/candidate is corrupt and spreads your name around. And in any case, if they are corrupt, then at least you have exposed that.

3. Boycott any business that supports PRIDE. Again just think of the things that PRIDE represents and supports. PRIDE is an atrocity against human dignity and children’s innocence. Any business that is too lazy to look at what PRIDE really represents, doesn’t deserve your dollars. Don’t go out and harass that business, or attack them on social media. Just stop shopping there, and if someone asks you to patronize them, or you learn that they support PRIDE while you are there, (pay what you owe,) calmly explain that you will not support them unless they change, and move on. Don’t make a scene. Don’t rant. Just stop patronizing.

This is the hardest one. There are a lot of business that have forced support of PRIDE on us. Financial Institutions for instance. We can’t keep our ‘credit’ in our mattress. I understand you need things like that, but do you best to minimize your patronizing. If at all possible get the product or service from somewhere that doesn’t support pride. If they offer you a product or service that is not needed, explain that support of pride is why you choose to live without that product or service.

If you have made it this far, you have either gotten a sore neck from all the agreeing nods, or you have reinforced the rampart and put the heat to the tar for my forthcoming feathering. Either way, I appreciate that you read what I wrote. I hope you take it to heart, and try to apply my suggestions.

We are at an impasse in our culture and politics. We either take a stand for truth and righteousness, or cave to lies and evil. We will never recover as a province as long as we continue to reject truth in favor of appeasement. Our economy will crumble, our crops will fail and our people will starve, and our lives will be forfeit to the fancy of our fiefs in the LGBT™-government coalition.

Joshua 24:15 English Standard Version (ESV [adapted for Canada])

15 And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the Lord, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your fathers served in the region beyond the [the Atlantic], or the gods of the [LGBT] in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.

Tags, , , , , , , , , , ,

Interphobia, Journalistic Malpractice, & The Smear Campaign Against CPoSD76

Last Wednesday, the 21st of June, 2017, Tim Kalinowski of Medicine Hat News(MHN) wrote an article about the CPoSD76 submitting an amendment after the June 2017 Board meeting, to their petition that was presented to the Board on September 19th 2016. There were two key problems with this article, one of which being a serious instance of journalistic malpractice, and the other being of a derogatory and disrespectful nature.

The two issues are intertwined both being the cause of, and symptom of each other. I’m going to try and make that statement make sense, but it is going to involve a bit of the history of who I am, and what has happened with the Board of SD76 since February of 2016.

Back in Feb, 2016 I attended my first ever Board Meeting, as my daughter had just started attending Kindergarten at a School within SD76s authority. Like thousands of other parents across Alberta, I was alarmed at the crass way in which Minister Eggen was bullying his agenda onto all the boards in Alberta. From the tone and tenor of the February meeting, I immediately knew I had to give a presentation to the Board, and be active in the fight to protect all children from the dangerous and reckless policies that were being brought in under the guise of ‘safe and caring’.

During the March 2016 regular Board Meeting, I gave a presentation on some of the concerns I had with Board Policy 621, and 622. Keep in mind, at the time, I did not know the final wording of the policy, nor did I know the procedures that would be implemented the following school year. My concerns have only expanded since then.

If you watch the presentation, you will note that I publicly came out as intersex. (Peggy Revell of MHN was there for the presentations, and reported on them.) Before I prepared my presentation, only 5 people (that I am aware of) in my life knew about my defect. My parents, my spouse, the doctor who delivered me, and one friend in my entire life that I felt comfortable enough with to share that personal detail about myself.

In the days leading up to my presentation I struggled with weather I should out myself like that.

In the days leading up to my presentation I struggled with weather I should out myself like that. I wondered at the harm it might bring to my family, what it might do to my social life. Would I be subject to the ridicule that the LGBTQIA2S+(LGBT) were saying was happening at epidemic levels. The harassment and discrimination that was sure to follow, as I understood it, was going to drive me to thoughts of suicide.

In the days leading up to my presentation, I shared my ‘family secret’ with a couple more people in order to test the waters, and see what they thought about me ‘going public’. Those people supported me in my decision to go public. They believed that no better candidate existed to raise the alarm about the policies, than someone who the policies were purported to protect.

After I came out, I did not receive the discrimination that the LGBT led me to believe would follow. No religious zealots screaming about how I was an abomination. I didn’t lose my job, or get calls from my mortgage provider. Yes there were a few very awkward conversations afterwards, more because of human curiosity, than because of aversion to who I was.

No, the discrimination that I have gotten, has been of a more sinister nature. It has been a concerted effort to demean, discredit, and erase and rewrite who and what I am, and the values I represent. This brings me to the first issue with Tim Kalinowski’s article.

During the interview about the petition amendment, Mr. Kalinowski specifically asked me about the “Christian Evangelical” values of the CPoSD76, and what mutual agreement the group could hope to achieve with the board. I made a clear distinction to Mr. Kalinowski between what my values may be, and what the values of the group may be. Despite this clear fact, and the fact that the article was not an opinion piece, Mr. Kalinowski decide to inject his opinion into the article in the midst of quoting me. He stated that “our particular (Christian) values” were what we were trying to convey. Despite me clearly stating that I was talking about the group values and not my own, he misconstrued what values the CPoSD76 represent.

The values that the CPoSD76 hold have been clearly evident for months, and can be easily found.

The values that the CPoSD76 hold have been clearly evident for months, and can be easily found. Our values cross religious and political boundaries. Our values are shared by over 30 different community organizations across Medicine Hat. Those values are Family values. They are community values. They are values that unite, rather than divide and isolate into ‘victim’ groups. They are values that joined groups together that have not worked together for over 100 years. They are values shared by Theists and Atheists. By many who identify as LGBT. Despite what the likes of David Eggen and Christopher Wells would have you believe.

As I’ve stated, the fact that the values of the CPoSD76 are shared by so many has been readily apparent for months. It was stated on the Petition Submission in September 2016. It has been stated multiple times in media releases. It has been stated on this website since it’s launch over 2 months ago, and it has been stated in our facebook group. In fact, it has even been shown on MHN’s own website. On the same day that Mr. Kalinowski published his article, MHN conducted a poll, asking if people agreed with the CPoSD76. The results of which was that 54% agreed, and 34% did not. (12% were unsure.)

Despite the numerous sources of information that could have been drawn upon to find out what the values are of the CPoSD76, Mr. Kalinowski decided it was better to re-frame them as Christian values. Why is that? Well, the reason is because my being an intersex person does not fit the narrative of the “LGBT” trade mark, which is a whole separate ‘group’ than the average LGBT person you would meet on the street, or for instance, the type that would sign our petition. Lets call this group the LGBT™ for the sake of clarity.

…they believe themselves to have transcended human understanding of ‘identity’ and ‘gender.’

The LGBT™ are a political group. They are a group that wants power, and wants all barriers and norms around sexuality completely abolished. They hate traditional family, and they hate religion. They hate the natural, common values of over 90% of the population, that have been held for millennia, and as explained in my “Trans-Hippo” post, they believe themselves to have transcended human understanding of ‘identity’ and ‘gender.’ As a result the LGBT™ believe themselves to be better than you or I. After all, they have a more divine understanding than you or I.

Naturally, since the LGBT™ wants power, they gravitated towards those of a totalitarian nature, in order that they might pass the laws that grant them such power and protections. This is why we have Bill 10, the Guidelines to Best Practices, PRISM, C-16, Bill 89. These all grant the LGBT™ the power to force the destruction of the long held family values, and by threat of imprisonment or the loss of your Children, force the acceptance of only the LGBT™‘s errant view. Even if a contrary view is coming from an LGBTQIA2S+ person. But like Icarus in his hubris flying to close to the sun, so has the hubris of the LGBT™ risen.

This whole hysteria started around a study from UBC that said Trans people were suicidal, and had ‘perceived’ to have been ‘bullied’ at some point in their youth. The study didn’t go into detail about who they might have been bullied by, or what that ‘bullying’ even looked like. I’ve written at length about this, but suffice to say, the case study wasn’t even random, which is standard practice in reputable studies.

The LGBT™ then latched onto this study and ran like wild fire with it. Completely ignoring decade old data that showed that ‘approving’ of the Trans life style, and societal acceptance of it made negligible (google “post opp trans still suicidal”) difference in the suicide rate of Trans people. Multiple sources, some of which I cited in my e-mails to the board before my presentation, were ignored in favour of pushing the LGBT™ agenda. Worse still, even post-op trans people have nearly the same suicide rate as pre-op.

The wax was beginning to drip from the LGBT™’s wings.

Team LGBT™ knowing these facts to be true, knew of the flaw in their logic. Que team LGBTi. The argument then went like this. “You know, some people are born with the wrong sex organs. Some even have both. These intersex people have had the wrong identity forced upon them by doctors and parents, therefor they should get to choose. Gender Fluidity, it’s a thing.”

LGBTi said they were just speaking up for those intersex people that were to afraid to identify with their ‘true’ gender. But then I spoke up, and roundly denounced their proposed policies, proving that the LGBTi were not in fact speaking for intersex people. So back to LGBT™, and now it was about the GSA’s. Then the Gay porn links were discovered. (Which I warned would happen only a week before, because it happened in the UK.) Then it was about outing the gays. Except that GSAs have gay and straight attending, and keeping extracurricular activities secret from parents is illegal. The wax was beginning to drip from the LGBT™’s wings.

Elsewhere, on a different front another battle was raging. You will remember I said, the LGBT™ knew of their flawed logic? While the battle Raged in Alberta, Parliament was lobbied by the LGBT™ to pass C-16. C-16 is “An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code” to compel people to use the preferred pronouns of a persons self identified gender. On June 15th, 2017, C-16 became law. Each person in conversation, if told of the preferred pronouns of the other person, must use their preferred pronouns, or will be found to have violated their human rights, and may now be found to have committed a hate crime against the person who identified their pronouns.

This finally brings us to the second problem with Mr. Kalinowski’s article. That of the fact that he willfully refused to use my preferred pronouns. C-16 specifically protects my gender identity. At the very beginning of the interview, Mr. Kalinowski asked me to state my name into his recorder. I did so, and specifically stated my preferred pronouns, to which he chuckled.

Thinking that this may have simply happened because Mr. Kalinowski was unaware of the passing of C-16, I e-mail him and MHN on June 21, asking that he show me the respect I am legally due, and to correct the inaccurate statement of the Christian values of the CPoSD76. I asked that these simple corrections be done within 24hrs. As of today, the 25, I have seen no such correction, and received no response to my e-mail.

This is not the first time inconvenient facets of the the LGBT™ narrative have been ignored in order to silence, and oppress those that have not capitulated to it. In the 16 months that this safe and caring agenda has been pushed, I have been directly insulted by administration, accused of altering recordings to make the Board look bad, of violating FOIP laws, threatened with legal action beyond simply court costs, and I’m intersex.

If those are the lengths they go to silence and discredit an intersex person, what do you think they are doing and will do to people who have no claim to minority protections? Just how safe and caring do you think your ‘cis’ children are going to be from bullying and oppression by the LGBT™. When policies are written specifically to reject to even HEAR an opposing view, no matter the scientific evidence, as 622 is. What lengths do you think they will go to to impose their own form of bigotry? That is what it is after all, pure unadulterated bigotry. If you have a better word for an intolerance of any opinion other than your own being represented or even allowed, an intolerance of any other type or form of education, I would be happy to hear it.


Definition of bigotry



  1. 1 :  obstinate or intolerant devotion to one’s own opinions and prejudices :  the state of mind of a bigot overcoming his own bigotry

Tags, , , , , , , , , ,

Daily Tidbit

No quote today