Tag Archive gsa

An open letter, to the Alberta Ombudsman…

To the honourable Marianne Ryan,

I am writing to you today on behalf of parents, grandparents, guardians, concerned families, and adult residents of Alberta.

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that you open a public provincial inquiry and/or investigation into:

  • Alberta Education
  • the Office of the Minister of Education
  • the Alberta Teachers Association
  • the Alberta School Boards Association
  • the Edmonton Public School District
  • Calgary Board of Education
  • Medicine Hat Public School District #76
  • Lethbridge School District #51
  • Battle River School Division
  • Sturgeon Public School Division
  • St Paul Education Regional Division No. 1 [Edit: request for investigation of this division is withdrawn]

The purpose of the inquiry/investigation would be to identify the individuals responsible for the pattern of misconduct and abuse of human rights that is affecting the province of Alberta, so that appropriate disciplinary actions or reprimands may be given, and to see appropriate checks and balances implemented to prevent further abuse and/or negligence from continuing to occur within all levels of the Alberta Ministry of Education.

The undersigned understand the scope, and the resources and time undertaking such an investigation would require. As taxpaying residents, we believe that our money would be well spent if it meant protecting our children and our rights from further abuse.

We also hope that you understand the gravity of the abuses which we perceive to be occurring systemically throughout Alberta Education. Not since the time of the residential schools has the government, in the eyes of the public, so blatantly abused the human rights of the governed. In so doing, all trust and respect for Alberta Education has been destroyed in our minds. When so many have lost faith in the institution, the institution becomes incapable of fulfilling its duties, and is rendered ineffectual.

While we understand many issues have not been proven in court, and understand some may turn out to be rumor or conjecture, we do not believe this to be the case for the majority of our concerns. A proper impartial investigation would set these concerns to rest, and would engender rebuilt trust in Alberta Education, the process, and the effectualness of government.

Alberta is at a critical crossroads, nigh also Canada as a nation. Civil unrest is bubbling under the surface. Albertan’s have become disenfranchised with their government, and the refusal by all political parties, government, and civil institutions to look into our concerns has not calmed the situation. It has in fact served to deepen the frustration and tension.

As we go into our reasons for requesting that you open an inquiry and/or investigation, please [bear] in mind that we do not do this flippantly. While each case or concern may or may not have “exhausted all avenues of appeal,” we do believe that proper processes have been reasonably followed. When you have been threatened harassed and abused into silence, you become hopeless in your belief that appealing is even worth the effort and it seems pointless. It appears that no one really cares. This is why we come to you.

Our concerns, and thus our reasoning in making this request can be chiefly categorized into two primary groupings;

  1. The sexual exploitation, grooming, molestation, and interference in the physical, social, moral, and ethical development our children outside the authority and mandate of Alberta Education.
  2. The abuse and erosion of our family, parental, religious, and association rights under the Alberta Constitution, the Canadian Charter of Human Rights, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

While each concern may appear unique, we believe that there is enough evidence to conclude a pattern of systemic abuse of authority and position that leads back to the office of the Minister of Education and the Alberta Ministry of Education as a whole. This request does not contain details of each concern, but should our request be granted, we are certain that those individuals or groups who brought the concern forward would freely and gratefully cooperate with the investigation to see it come to a swift conclusion.

The following list of concerns is not an exhaustive list. We have filtered it to the most pressing and egregious, and believe that it outlines why we perceive there to be a systemic pattern of abuse. Those concerns  that have been filtered from this list we believe would become apparent during the course of the investigation.

The concerns that we have stem from the following:

  • Alberta Education,
    1. Alberta Education’s attempt to shut down Wisdom Home Schooling without respect to process, and without consideration to the impact upon the students who were/are under its authority.
    2. Alberta Education’s connection to Dr. Kristopher Wells, The Institute for Sexual Minority Studies & Services (ISMSS), and the GSA Network
    3. Alberta Education’s failure to screen links posted to the Alberta GSA Network website for inappropriate material.
    4. Alberta Education’s failure to implement processes and safeguards against inappropriate material be available through government funded resources.
    5. Alberta Education’s failure to punish or reprimand those responsible for the failures of the Alberta GSA Network.
    6. Alberta Education’s ongoing plan to rewrite curriculum without public understanding of who contributed to its creation or detailed explanations of what the stated goals are or why those goals were set.
  • the Office of the Minister of Education,
    1. The public insinuation that Catholic education did and does not teach spousal consent, and the implication that Catholic schools endorsed rape.
    2. The statement from the minister implying that those that did not agree with Alberta Education’s policies and actions were incapable of critical thought.
    3. The Minister’s attempt to threaten removal of and violate the religious rights of the Independent Baptist Christian Education Society.
    4. The minister’s refusal to reveal who contributed to Alberta Education’s planned rewrite of school curriculum.
    5. The minister’s refusal to hear debate on Bill-24 “An act to Support Gay Straight Alliances”, the minister’s refusal to consider the ramifications of the Bill, the minister’s refusal to set age restrictions or to consider appropriateness, and allegations that the minister deceived the public as to its contents, intent, purpose and implementation.
    6. The Minister’s refusal to respond to questions regarding how school policies that are religious in nature violate Bill-24.
  • the Alberta Teachers Association,
    1. The ATA’s association, promotion, and support of Dr. Kristopher Wells, what work exactly he does for Alberta Education, and what role he plays in the education of Alberta’s children.
    2. The ATA’s resolution to attempt to undermine the Alberta Constitution, and its establishment of a public and separate education system.
    3. The ATA’s resolution to strip parents of their right to be informed when sensitive topics are brought forward in class, and their lobbying of the government to violate the human rights of Families.
    4. The ATA’s support of efforts to strip funding from independent schools, and deny Albertans their right to fund separate schools.
    5. Allegations of the ATA’s harassment and intimidation of some of its members based on their associations and personal or religious beliefs.
  • the Alberta School Boards Association,
    1. The ASBA’s support of efforts to strip funding from independent schools, and deny Albertans of their right to fund separate schools.
    2. Allegations of attempts to impose authority on Home Schooling Boards and the rights of home schooled children.
  • the Edmonton Public School District,
    1. Allegations that children have been taken off of school property by private individuals without the consent of parents, and exposed to pornographic material, sexual interference, and  child sexual grooming.
  • Calgary Board of Education (CBE),
    1. Allegations of improper process, unfair evaluation, and dismissal of a petition against the planned implementation of policy directed by the Minister of Education and the “Guidelines to Best Practices” (GTBP) document.
    2. Allegations of sexual interference/grooming within GSAs under CBE authority
    3. Allegations of violations of parental human rights and child endangerment within GSAs under CBE authority.
    4. Allegations of threats against parents, staff, and students who would reveal the internal workings of GSAs under CBE authority.
    5. The relationship between the CBE, GSAs, and the Calgary Sexual Health Center.
  • Medicine Hat Public School District #76 (MHP),
    1. Allegations of deception of the public by Board Members and Administration.
    2. Allegations of threats, intimidation, and harassment of parents, staff, and students by Administration and Board Members.
    3. Allegations that schools within the district were encouraging and engaged in cross dressing activities with students.
    4. Allegations of disregard for instructions given by the Court of Queens Bench with respect to an appeal of a petition submitted to the MHP Board similar to the petition submitted to the CBE.
  • Lethbridge School District #51 (LSD51),
    1. Allegations of mismanagement of a petition submitted by the public, with similar intent as the petition rejected by the CBE.
    2. Allegations of residents from outside LSD51 participating and voting in process that came as a result of the aforementioned petition.
  • Battle River School Division (BRSD),
    1. Attempts by the BRSD to discriminate against Cornerstone Christian Academy for their religious beliefs.
    2. Attempts by BRSD to label portions of the Bible as hate speech.
  • Sturgeon Public School Division
    1. Allegations of threats, intimidation, and harassment of both students and parents of Sturgeon Country High School, by both board members and administrative staff in an attempt to silence debate and opposition by the majority against the changes to bathroom policy imposed by the Board, under the direction of Alberta Education and the Office of the Minister of Education.
  • St Paul Education Regional Division No. 1 (SPERD1)
    1. [EDIT: It has come to our attention that some of the details in this section were inaccurate or based on conjecture. Namely that this was not the correct school division. SPERD1 has no allegations against it. This concern is withdrawn. More accurate information may be provided if or when available.]

As previously stated, this is not an exhaustive list, but it is extensive, and considering that none of these concerns have been fully addressed, and put to rest, it gives the public the perception of systemic problems of sexual misconduct and rights abuses within Alberta Education.

As an advocate for the governed to those that govern, we believe that it is both within your authority and mandate to open an investigation to get to the truth of these matters. Some of the undersigned have had direct involvement in the process in several of the concerns listed and have come away feeling rejected, disrespected, ignored, and condescended to.

Because of the rejection by all levels of the Alberta Ministry of Education, and even some courts, we believe that this is our last resort and hope of seeing these concerns resolved, and we fear that should an investigation not be opened by some level of government or law enforcement, all trust in Alberta Education will be permanently damaged beyond hope of repair. Throwing this province we call home into crises.

It is with reconciliation and hope of restored trust that we make this request of you.

Respectfully,
The Undersigned:



Tags, , , , , , , ,

The Eminent Sire’s Pontifications Episode 4 Dangerous People Pt. 2 – The 3 ‘I’s in Education

[UPDATE:] More articles on the attack upon the foundations of Society.

Life Site News seems to be the largest group to pick up this story? Wonder why that is?

Alberta’s NDP says Christian school cannot state that God’s authority supersedes human authority

Canadian province demands faith-based schools purge religious content from policies

[UPDATE:] Video from John Carpay of the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms.

Alberta Government Attacking Religious Schools

Alberta Education states that failure to remove the religious content from a school’s “Safe and Caring” policies “may result in funding implications … and the suspension or cancellation of accreditation.”The Justice Centre represents parents and dozens of schools in a constitutional challenge to the Bill 24 secrecy provisions, which require withholding information from parents about their own children.Learn more about this case at www.JCCF.ca

Posted by Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms on Friday, September 28, 2018

[UPDATE:] Some additional articles on this topic have been published just in the last 24 hours. You can find them highlighted in the references link.

Good evening concerned parents.  [Skip to 7:50 to bypass all this extra stuff and get to the topic.]

Welcome episode 4 pt 2 of ESP

Long time since last update.  Have good reason. The material just keeps coming at a fever pitch.

First, a note about some of the changes to the website I’m making.

I’ve set up the Disqus commenting system, so that you don’t need an account on cposd76.com to talk about posts. You do still have to have an account to post to the Forums.

I’ve eliminated the parent watch ‘post’ page, and just made the forums the parent watch page. The separate page was redundant, and the forums do the job nicely.

You will notice in the coming weeks several Facebook feeds being incorporated directly into the site. These are from partners and like minded political and advocacy groups. (Greater detail in video on this.)

I’m developing an app that will post content from this site directly to facebook the minute it goes live. This way we will have content flowing both ways, and circumvent some of facebook’s manipulations.

I’ll be making a few changes to the resources and ‘get involved’ pages. They are in dire need of an update.

A quick update on C.P.O.S. and what is going on there. That too has been delayed.

Changes to law and outcomes from court cases, scheduling difficulties, time, and finances have caused delays, in prongs of the plan, but they are still moving forward.

The planned meetings for the Create prong are still being organized. Slated most likely for October.

Finally, the Dangerous people in Education, and boy oh boy, do I have a lot of material for this.

Tags, , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Eminent Sire’s Pontifications Episode 4 Dangerous People Pt.1 – Rob Wells

Click for List of Sources for Video

Tags, , , ,

ESP Ep. 2: Bill-24 Injunction

In this episode of the “Eminent Sire’s Pontifications” I discuss the June 20th Court Injunction against Bill-24 heard at the Medicine Hat Court of Queens Bench

GSA court challenge underway in Medicine Hat

Legal challenge of GSA participation privacy draws crowd to Medicine Hat courthouse

Closely watched Alberta gay-straight alliance challenge fills courtroom

No decision in GSA law case

Danielle Smith and John Carpay talk about the Court Injunction

The Internet Is Head Over Heels for This Adorable, Openly Gay 3-Year-Old

Some other info you might be interested in.

The Justice in the Bill-24 Injunction made reference to the TWU decision. The link below is an opinion piece from a non religious person on that decision.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-twu-decision-is-a-blow-to-diversity/

 

The following video is about a man #Walkedaway from being a liberal. Interesting watch.

Facebook Video

Tags, , , , , ,

C.P.O.S. – Protect: The Sex Ed Walk Out & Bill 24

In my last post, I stated that the CPoSD76 were working on a plan to help combat the clearly insidious intentions of Alberta Public Education to indoctrinate and sexualize our children with their twisted idea of ethics and sexuality.

The plan is being called CPOS. Create, protect, orate, and solidify. … Over the next Month, I will be making 4 separate posts about what exactly each prong of the ‘4orked’ plan is, and how the coalition hopes to implement it. For now though, there are two prongs you can get started on yourself.

This post is the first of 4 that go into detail of what the collaborative plan of the CPoSD76 is. As also mentioned earlier, this is a forked plan, with multiple facets happening simultaneously. Although the acronym, C.P.O.S., may be in a particular order, the execution of it may happen in a different order.

“Protect”

Today’s post is about the “Protect” portion:
As was noted in my comment in the last post, “Life Site” News published an article (Mat Walsh at The Daily Wire also published about it) about how parents are pulling their children out of school to protest the grotesque sexualization of children from k-12 in public education around the globe.

Protect: April 23rd, 2018 is international walk out day to protest the obscene, abusive, bigoted, and abhorrent sex education that is being forced in schools around the world. (Bill-24 provides no limits to the material that your child can be exposed to at school.) I encourage every parent, who’s children are not home schooled, to pull their child out of school on April 23rd. Explain that you do not support the sexualization of our children for the satisfaction of adults with unhealthy obsessions over the sexual development of other people’s pre-pubescent children, that Bill-24 is an unconstitutional violation of human rights, and that parents have first discretion and authority over their children and their education, not the government. Do this whether your school has supported the family or not, as a show of solidarity to those who have not had the ability or choice to send their children to a school that supports their rights.

For the U.S., it is “Comprehensive Sex Education,” for Australia it is “Safe Schools,” for British Columbia it is “SOGI 123“, and of course for Alberta it is the Sex Clubs with ultimate power, the GSAs. The details of the #SexEdSitOut are available here, and you can add your city, and sign a petition etc. I fully endorse this sit out, and the goals are in line with the essential intent of the “Protect” phase of the C.P.O.S. plan. I intend on keeping my kids home on the 23rd, and a generic outline for an e-mail you can send to your child’s principal is available here. (Be sure to CC any other administrative officiall that would need to know of your child(ren)s absence.)

Although my child’s school is not currently supporting the sexualization of minors, they are under the thumb of SD76’s jurisdiction, and that can be forced to change at any moment. I am however pulling my child out in an act of solidarity for those who’s children are being exposed to this obscene material and teaching, and as an act to draw awareness to the actions and intent of Alberta Education. I encourage you to do so as well.

Another action you can take to “Protect” your children from the errant direction of Alberta’s public education, that is also inline with the principle of  CPoSD76 C.P.O.S. plan, is to support the challenge of Bill 24. On April 5th, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms filed a court application challenging Bill-24. Bill-24 gives GSAs the power to form and operate without any oversight, and with the power to teach literally anything. Not only without your consent as a parent, but without even your knowledge of it. You can protect your children from this malicious law by spreading word of it and it’s challenge in court.

I heard directly from John Carpay, that media is minimizing coverage of this in an attempt to keep the public ignorant of the facts, and the challenge. You can counter this be sharing the links provided in the Parent Watch Forum, and by telling as many people as possible about what is going on. One of the groups on the court challenge is Parents for Choice in Education, and you can find out more and support their efforts here. The CPoSD76 are also working with the JCCF to support in any way they can, and may be playing a more active and intentional part in the challenge going forward. One final action you can take is to make a donation to the JCCF to aid in the financial burden of challenging the law in court.

This brings us finally to the specific details of the “Protect” prong of the C.P.O.S. plan. These details will be available via a permanent page in the top menu later [this week].

The stated goal of the “Protect” prong is to:

Protect our children from current curriculum, policy, and legislation that undermines the family, and the security or safety of our children through; legal and peaceful protest and/or walkouts, whistle blower or accountability procedures, and assistance for parents and students to navigate the bureaucratic educational system.

The “Protect” page will have a list of current protective actions that the CPoSD76 are undertaking. (Including the two listed above.) The details of how you can participate in those actions will vary depending on action being undertaken.

Some things that are in the works, besides the two mentioned above are:

  • A list of keywords and phrases that parents need to be aware of, and what actions may be necessary should those phrases come up in a classroom.
  • A pledge to pull your child, or instruct them to leave a class should an inappropriate topic be brought up in class. Along with instructions on how to inform the teachers on the rational.
  • A hotline (email or phone is still to be determined) that parents can contact should a ‘trigger’ topic be discussed, or an incident of prejudice or bias against a student, teacher or staff member, or parent that occur within the district; this would also be available for whistle blowers to expose corruption, malfeasance, or professional incompetence with the district. The CPoSD76 would then help the whistle blower follow proper channels and get protections for the information they are divulging.
  • Simple forms that individuals can fill out, if they wish to request assistance in navigating bureaucracy, knowing specific rights on issues, or understanding policy.

This list is not exhaustive, and is subject to fluctuations. The CPoSD76 is of course open to feed back and improvement, and if you wish to help or participate in any way, please feel free to contact us for more information.

Tags, , , , , , , ,

Fear is not bad, how you handle it can be.

On March 22nd, Steven Crowder was live at SMU. After the show, a young man who identified as a protest sign asked if he should have kids in a time when you are accosted for your believes. Crowder at one point states that “Fear is not bad, how you handle it is.”

I know all of you are afraid. I have been too. You think then when I took the petition to appeal at the Court of Queens Bench, the first challenge of it’s kind in Canada, that I wasn’t afraid? Do you think the School District didn’t WANT me to be afraid? Why do you think they said they were going to come after me for ‘hours of time’ spent on evaluating the petition? Why do you think they threatened a teacher who witnessed the petition? How about the ridiculous accusation that somehow I was defaming an institution and a policy? They did this because, like every corrupt and dictatorial governing body in human history, they know that fear is the most likely tool to keep the populace in line.

So how do you know if you are handling the fear correctly? The way I measure it, is are you brave enough to risk your own health and reputation to protect and serve another, or are you taking the cowards route of saving your own skin?

John 15:13 – Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends.

If you are able to overcome your fear, to help another, than I say you are handling the fear correctly. Who is more deserving of selfless bravery than your children? Who better to stand up to than those too cowardly to protect your children from those who wish to harm or use them?

Don’t forget, most times, they are more afraid of you, (or their superiors) than you are of them. Paranoia is fear on steroids, and who is more paranoid than a dictator afraid of losing their power. When you stand up to a bully, he realizes that fear can no longer be used against you, and he is the one who becomes afraid. There is no greater evidence of this, than to see how vilely they came after the Include Parents campaign, and the level of fear that was expressed at the thought of myself getting elected to the School Board. (They were really sweating that one.)

Take courage fellow parent, and don’t take garbage from anyone. Your children are quite literally your birthright. Literally yours, by birth, and no sycophantic bureaucrat has any right to tell you how to raise them, especially when they want to subject them to abusive ideology like prepubescent transgenderism.

Take courage, or you just might find you have no children or grand children; whether by fear, by abusive sterilization, by suicide, or by tyrannical kidnapping.

Tags, , , , , ,

Proof that Notley is a Liar, and Eggen wants to expose your children to sexual material

On Thursday, Eggen slapped out his “will someone not think of the gays!” legislation. Even calling it the Kenney bill. Claiming that his proposed legislation would protect children from those abusive intolerant parents that permeate every corner of society. Never giving factual information on numbers of students that are actually abused by their parents for their sexuality. Never defining what he considers abusive behaviour. Never actually reporting those situations to police or child services, (which is the law,) and believing every story shared with a dozen “FWD::”s in front of it. Facts, evidence, and the truth don’t fit into his narrative.

In fact, truth seems to be the biggest issue he and Notley have trouble with. We’ve been told for two years that GSA are supportive groups that save lives, but when it was discovered the the material at these ‘clubs’ was about pushing sexual fetishes, and a work around for the “opt out clause;” with materials that included how to have safe anal fisting sessions with your partner, pantyhose parties, and sponsoring of drag reading sessions, total silence from Eggen. Parents were rightly outraged.

Parents then rightly demanded that they be told if their child was attending these ‘sex ed’ clubs. Under section 50 of the Alberta School Act, parents had the right to opt their children out of ANY sexual material at school. Well, then the Eggen/Notley outrage machine respond, and said “you are wanting to out gays to their parents, you horrible human beings!” The preposterous absurdity of that argument was clearly evident in the very name of the sex clubs, “Gay Straight Alliance.” A name they now want to protect under the law.

(c) by adding the following after subsection (3):
(3.1) For greater certainty, the principal shall not prohibit or discourage students from choosing a name that includes “gay straight alliance” or “queer-straight alliance”.

Imagine if a Catholic group demanded that they be allowed to have a club in school called “The Salvation of Lost Souls,” and that name was forced without consent, by law, or else legal consequences would follow?

So after it was discovered that Albertan’s weren’t buying there thinly veiled cover over the sex clubs that had pornography, and how to pay for sex, as supportive ‘resources,’ they set their phasers to kill; got their media lapdogs to dig up the ‘proposed’ Catholic Sex Ed curriculum, cut and pasted sentences together in the Ministry of Truth editorial room, and screamed, through the premier herself, that Catholics want to teach Rape.

Wrapped up in the feigned outrage over a non-existent proposal within the Catholic curriculum, Notley her self said, AND I QUOTE: “Parents have the right — and they have had the right for a very, very long time — to pull their kids from curriculum and education around sexual health. And they will continue to have that right.”
She said that on October 24th. 10 days ago. She must think Albertan’s have exceptionally short memories, because yesterday, her Minister of Education tabled legislation that revokes that right, and proves without a shadow of a doubt that GSA’s are about instructing on sex.

From the proposed legislation:


9 Section 50.1 is amended by adding the following after subsection (3):
(4)For greater certainty, this section does not apply with respect to the establishment or operation of a voluntary student organization referred to in section 16.1 or the organizing or holding of an activity referred to in section 16.1.

7 Explanatory Notes
8 Exemption from section 45.1; application of investigation, inquiry provisions.
9 Section 50.1 presently reads:

50.1 (1) A board shall provide notice to a parent of a student where courses of study, educational programs or instructional aterials, or instruction or exercises, include subject-matter that deals primarily and explicitly with religion or human sexuality.
(2) Where a teacher or other person providing instruction, eaching a course of study or educational program or using the instructional materials eferred to in subsection
(1) receives a written request signed by a parent of a student that the student be excluded from the instruction, course of study, educational program or use of instructional materials, the teacher or other person shall in accordance with the request of the parent permit the student, without academic penalty,
(a) to leave the classroom or place where the instruction, course of study or educational program is taking place or the instructional materials are being used for the duration of the part of the instruction, course of study or educational program, or the use of the instructional materials, that includes the subject-atter referred to in subsection (1), or 2


Section 16.1 presently reads:
16.1(1) If one or more students attending a school operated by a board request a staff member employed by the board for support to establish a voluntary student organization, or to lead an activity intended to promote a welcoming, caring, respectful and safe learning environment that respects
diversity and fosters a sense of belonging, the principal of the school shall
(a) permit the establishment of the student organization or the holding of the activity at the school, and
(b) designate a staff member to serve as the staff liaison to facilitate the establishment, and the ongoing operation, of the student organization or to assist in organizing the activity.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), an organization or activity includes an organization or activity that promotes equality and non-discrimination with respect to, without limitation, race, religious belief, colour, gender, gender identity, gender expression, physical disability, mental disability, family status or sexual orientation, including but not limited to organizations such as 2
(d) by adding the following after subsection (5):
(6) The principal is responsible for ensuring that notification, if any, respecting a voluntary student organization or an activity referred to in subsection (1) is limited to the fact of the establishment of the organization or the holding of the activity.


If GSA’s are not about instructing on sex and sexuality, then there would be no need to exempt them from section 16.1. If parents continued to have the right to opt out their children from sexual instruction, than there would be no exceptions for GSAs. Let me remind you, that the GSAs and their ‘resources’ have been caught teaching about transgenderism to 5 year olds, that they have had dozens of links to sexually explicit material on the GSA network, and that they have handed out pamphlets on how to have safe anal fisting sessions. (Something literally impossible to do safely.)

This is what Eggen’s proposed legislation ACTUALLY produces. Children are being harmed, in real life cases.

This kind of legislation is a pedophiles dream! We already know that sexual predators seek out positions where they can enact their fantasies, and we know that secrecy is their best ally. Now all they have to do is volunteer to be the organizer of the GSA. No standards of criteria, or expertise necessary. It is demonstrably clear the GSAs are being used to promote sexuality, and sexual education, otherwise why would they be exempt from the requirement of allowing a parent to opt out their child? If GSAs are not a wing of Alberta Education, a ‘class’ if you will, than why must the schools provide a staff member to run the ‘club’? Make no mistake, Eggen intends to use GSAs as a way of teaching his and his buddy’s(Wells) idea of sexuality. And he doesn’t care who gets hurt in the process.

Full document of proposed legislation

Tags, , , , , ,

Eggen Refuses to set up safeguards for our children

Leela Sharon Aheer stood up in legislature April 3rd during question period, and asked Education Minister David Eggen what he planned to do to monitor the the links and resources that were being given on the Alberta GSA Network website, and if he would apologize. Unsurprisingly Eggen would not answer the question, and instead tried to insinuate that parents raising these concerns were somehow putting the children at risk of ‘outing.’

Listen for yourself.

Leela Sharon Aheer – “Over the past couple of weeks we’ve seen instances where content linked to the Alberta Education website is clearly inappropriate for students, containing graphic and sexual content. Providing supports to all students is imperative, but giving students access to explicit content is wrong. The minister knows it, and – believe me – parents know it.
Yesterday I asked the minister to tell parents whose fault this is, why no one is monitoring this, and who is going to be held accountable.”

Tags, , , ,

Daily Tidbit

No quote today